Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Baughman v. Bill B., et al
as 19-1354
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN B., BILL B., AMANDA B. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLAINE BAUGHMAN
May v. Heimgartner
as 19-3206
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM D. MAY
Boles v. CDOC, et al
as 19-1314
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN REICHERT, MATTHEW POWELL, CUSTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL MARSHALL BOLES
Mays et al v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 1:2019cv00831
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mays, Romello Sloan and Romeo Sloan
3Rd Party Defendant:
C.H., Christopher Sharp and Tawanna Henderson
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 1965
Roane v. Frankie's Bar & Grill, et al
as 19-1059
Defendant:
KATHLEEN PATTON
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANKIE'S BAR & GRILL, AKA Frankie's Inc, a/k/a Frankie's Inc, dissolved May 27, 2016 and FRANKIE D. PATTON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KLANCIE A. ROANE
May v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv00637
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. May
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, The, Department of Health and Human Services, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States v. May
as 16-1366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DE'SHAUGHN JAHMALL MAYS
Bistline et al v. Jeffs et al
as 2:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Bistline , Ruby Jessop , Susan Broadbent and others
Defendant:
Warren Steed Jeffs, Rodney R. Parker and Snow Christensen & Martineau
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
USA v. $36,302.00 in United States currency seized on May 5, 2016, in Eagle County, Colorado
as 1:2016mc00138
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
$36,302.00 in United States currency seized on May 5, 2016, in Eagle County, Colorado
Willenborg v. Newcastle Home Loans, LLC
as 1:2016mc00104
Plaintiff:
Matt Willenborg
Defendant:
Newcastle Home Loans, LLC
Respondent:
Richey May & Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
