Cases 41 - 50 of 334
Towd Point Mtge. Trust 2019-3, U.S. Bank National v. Mead, et al
as 21-3211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOWD POINT MORTGAGE TRUST 2019-3, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Indenture Trustee
Defendant / Appellant:
DENISE L. MEAD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Tenant/Occupant, MARY DOE, Tenant/Occupant, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, if any, of Denise L. Mead and others
Licerio v. Lamb, et al
as 21-1375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY LICERIO
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER R. LAMB, OFFICER TEIGEN, DOCTOR MATTHEW DELIERE and others
Henard v. Jefferson Cty Jail, et al
as 21-1344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY E. HENARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON CTY JAIL, NURSE LAVINIA, DEPUTY VALENTINE and others
Paz-Zaldivar, et al v. Garland
as 21-9571
Petitioner:
INGRID YAMILETH PAZ-ZALDIVAR and JOHN DOE, a minor
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Brooks v. Reynolds, et al
as 21-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON BROOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESA REYNOLDS, DONALD CANFIELD, JEFF LONG and others
Aparicio Polanco, et al v. Garland
as 21-9567
Petitioner:
ALICIA APARICIO POLANCO, JANE/JOHN DOE and JOHN/JANE DOE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Fitzhenry v. Vivint Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00501
Plaintiff:
Mark Fitzhenry
Defendant:
Vivint Inc, DSI Distributing Inc doing business as DSI Systems, John Doe Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Davis v. GEO Group, et al
as 21-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK BOWEN, Warden, RITA HOOD, Major and others
Licerio v. Lamb, et al
as 21-1297
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY LICERIO
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER R. LAMB, OFFICER TEIGEN, DOCTOR MATTHEW DELIERE and others
Routt v. Hansford, et al
as 21-5051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN STEPHEN ROUTT
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTIN HANSFORD, ARAMARK CORPORATION, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
