Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Rodriguez-Perez v. Barr
as 20-9514
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
United States v. Jaracuaro-Perez
as 20-1046
Defendant / Appellant:
FIDENCIO JARACUARO-PEREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ezell v. Yates, et al
as 19-7065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Interim Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, TIFFANY ADE, Echo Maximum Unit Manager, Davis Correctional Facility, TERRY UNDERWOOD, Grievance Coordinator, Davis Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
R. HODGSON, Captain, James Crabtree Correctional Center, JASON BRYANT, Warden, Joseph Harp Correctional Center, LT. AUSTIN PARKS, Lt., James Crabtree Correctional Center and others
Gray v. Ade, et al
as 19-7059
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WRIGHT, Security Sergeant, CAPTAIN HATCHMAN, Security Captain, AKA Captain Hatton, OFFICER GARRISON, DOC Internal Affairs Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK RIDEOUT GRAY, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
United States v. Perez-Hernandez
as 19-2204
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO PEREZ-HERNANDEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perez-Osorio, et al v. Barr
as 19-9605
Petitioner:
MARTHA PEREZ-OSORIO and J.G.P., a minor
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
United States v. Perez-Hernandez
as 19-2205
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO PEREZ-HERNANDEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Perez-Ixta
as 19-1363
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN PEREZ-IXTA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Perez-Perez
as 19-2154
Defendant / Appellant:
ABIEL PEREZ-PEREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
