Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,096
Gomez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 23-9607
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR GOMEZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Ruiz-Nava v. Garland
as 23-9606
Petitioner: JOSE DAVID RUIZ-NAVA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Pinto, et al v. Garland
as 23-9605
Petitioner: FRANCIELY DE SOUZA PINTO and NICOLAS SOUZA-RODRIGUES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Maldonado-Magno, et al v. Garland
as 23-9604
Petitioner: WALTER MALDONADO-MAGNO, ANDREA UCHUYPOMA-PALOMINO and LOAN MALDONADO-UCHUYPOMA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Acosta-Cruz v. Garland
as 23-9601
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR ACOSTA-CRUZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Aguilar-Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-9600
Petitioner: SABINO AGUILAR-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Singh v. Garland
as 23-9598
Petitioner: JASVIR SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Weatherspoon v. B&B Gladstone LLC
as 2:2023cv02482
Plaintiff: Myisha Weatherspoon
Defendant: B&B Gladstone, LLC a Missouri Limited Liability Company doing business as RNR Tire Express and B&B Gladstone LLC a Missouri Limited Liability Company doing business as RNR Tire Express
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Singh v. Garland
as 23-9596
Petitioner: HARDEV SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
USSEC v. Mediatrix Capital, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: MARIA C. YOUNG, MICHAEL S. YOUNG, CASA CONEJO LLC and others
Defendant: MEDIATRIX CAPITAL INC., BLUE ISLE MARKETS, INC., St. Vincent & the Grenadines, BLUE ISLE MARKETS, LTD and others
Petitioner: KENNETH RINEY and AARON STEWART
Receiver: MARK B. CONLAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?