Cases 41 - 50 of 685
Johnson et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01910
Petitioner:
Duane Johnson and Antonia Glenda Johnson
Respondent:
Garfield Johnson and Jelena Johnson
United States v. Johnson
as 22-1206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JEROME JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rowland v. Viasat, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01350
Plaintiff:
Jason Rowland
Defendant:
Viasat, Inc., Mark D. Dankberg, Richard A. Baldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10 Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brick v. Darnell et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tisha Brick
Defendant:
Elaine Darnell, Kendra Otis, Lee Widner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Burgess et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Victoria Ann Burgess, Elizabeth F Johnson, Clark Walker Johnson and others
Defendant:
Howard Mitchell Johnson, HMJMOJ LLC, MOJ/HMJ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eddy County v. Allergan PLC et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Eddy County
Defendant:
Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis PLC, Allergan Finance LLC f/k/a Actavis, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bilinsky v. Gatos Silver, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael Bilinsky
Defendant:
Gatos Silver, Inc., Stephen Orr, Roger Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
