Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Tillmon v. County of Douglas, et al
as 19-1134
Defendant / Appellant:
J. YOUNG, Sergeant in Douglas County, in her official and individual capacities, KEITH PENRY, of the Douglas County Sheriffs Office in his official and individual capacities, TONY G. SPURLOCK, Douglas County Sheriff in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S), of the Douglas County Deputy Sheriff Medical Dept, in his, her, or their individual and official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES TILLMON
Richardson v. Werner, et al
as 19-1043
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT WERNER, Washington County Jail, Sheriff's Office and DEPUTY SMERE, Washington County Jail, Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SELBY RICHARDSON
McCoy v. Heimgartner, et al
as 19-3020
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU PATTERSON, First Sergeant, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity, FNU CARRELL, First Sergeant, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity, FNU GOAD, S.O.R.T. member, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERON MCCOY, JR.
Miles v. Conrad, et al
as 19-3028
Defendant / Appellee:
(FNU) CARDER, Sergeant, Reno County Sheriff's Department, in his official capacity, (FNU) CONRAD, Deputy, Reno County Sheriff's Department, in his official capacity, (FNU) MONDRAGON, Deputy, Reno County Sheriff's Department, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE L. MILES, JR.
In re: Harper
as 13-6163
Petitioner:
DALE E. HARPER
Respondent:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, JOHN DOE, T.M. Deputy Warden, NINA NAGEL-SILVA, Correctional Officer and others
Bey v. Arlington Texas City of et al
as 5:2012cv00911
Defendant:
Arlington Texas City of, Arlington Texas Police Department, Officer Deary and others
Plaintiff:
Noble T Hasaan Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
