Cases 51 - 60 of 171
Dawson v. Archambeau, et al
as 20-1451
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, T. SICOTTE, C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Parker v. Crow
as 20-5117
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALVIN PARKER
Strader v. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, et al
as 20-3245
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, BUTLER AND ASSOCIATES, CORECIVIC, f/k/a Corrections Corporation of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. STRADER
In re: Parkhurst
as 20-8068
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK R. PARKHURST
Respondent:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Foltz v. Wyoming Department, et al
as 20-8063
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD D. FOLTZ, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN, in his official capacity, AKA Eddie Wilson
Parker v. Crow
as 20-5107
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALVIN PARKER
Bowens v. Crow
as 20-6172
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRISTIAN DON BOWENS
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director of Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Vreeland v. Weiser, et al
as 20-1385
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK J. MULLIGAN, Attorney at Law, DAVID ZUPAN, Colorado Department of Corrections Warden, RYAN CRANE, Assistant Colorado Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Scott v. Lumpkin, et al
as 20-5103
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN OTHERS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY SCOTT
Boles v. CDOC, et al
as 20-1368
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN REICHERT, SHAWN NYGAARD, DEBRA GOHEEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL MARSHALL BOLES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
