Cases 51 - 60 of 89
United States of America et al v. Replogle et al
as 4:2012cv00501
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Oklahoma State of and Pamela Sue McCowan
Defendant:
Raymond L Replogle , Continuous Care Centers of Oklahoma Inc , Continuous Care Centers of Tulsa Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00275
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Department of Interior , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In re: Stouffer
as 12-6000
Petitioner:
BIGLER JOBE STOUFFER, II
Respondent:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Management Compensation Group Lee Inc et al v. Oklahoma State University
as 5:2011cv00967
Movant:
Management Compensation Group Lee Inc , John Ridings Lee and John Ridings Lee Company Inc
Respondent:
Oklahoma State University
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Management Compensation Group Lee Inc et al v. Oklahoma State University
as 5:2011mc00967
Movant:
Management Compensation Group Lee Inc , John Ridings Lee and John Ridings Lee Company Inc
Respondent:
Oklahoma State University
In re: Pemberton
as 11-6184
Petitioner:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Respondent:
JUSTIN JONES, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OKLAHOMA STATE REFORMATORY and others
Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2011cv00782
Plaintiff:
Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Adgeh v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Mekbib G Adgeh
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oklahoma State of v. Jackson
as 5:2011cv00605
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Lisa P Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
In re: Pemberton
as 11-6034
Petitioner:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Respondent:
JUSTIN JONES, JAMES RUDEK, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
