Cases 51 - 60 of 199
In re: Loggins
as 19-3142
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS and ROBERT D. HANNIGAN
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Apodaca v. GEO Corp, et al
as 19-2101
Defendant / Appellee:
HSA CENTURION MARTINEZ, DR. A. LAURSEN, GEO CORP, . C.E.O. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR ANDREW APODACA, SR.
Cedar Band of Paiutes et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
CBC Mortgage Agency, Cedar Band of Paiutes and Cedar Band Corporation
Defendant:
Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., Department of Housing and Urban Development, Brian D. Montgomery and others
Amicus Curiae:
Data Mortgage, American Financial Network, Washington State Housing Finance Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Pettit v. Hill
as 19-6055
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HILL, individually
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES A. PETTIT, SR., as the personal respresentative of the estate of Charles A. Pettit, Jr.
Loggins v. Pilshaw, et al
as 19-3065
Defendant / Appellee:
G. GORDON ATCHESON, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, HENRY W. GREEN, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, (FNU) LEWIS, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Loggins v. Norwood, et al
as 19-3051
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH NORWOOD, DAN SCHNURR and SHANNON MEYER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Nixon v. Hilton
as 19-3002
Petitioner / Appellant:
BARRY N. NIXON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DAWN HILTON, Colonel, Commandant USDB-Leavenworth
Harris Research, Inc. v. Alliano
as 1:2018cv00146
Defendant:
Robert M. Alliano, Sr.
Petitioner:
Harris Research, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Estate of Jon L. Bogue, The et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2018cv01425
Defendant:
Patrick S Adams, Sharon E Adams, John Alan Favre and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jon L. Bogue, The and Vicki L McCorkle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
