Cases 51 - 60 of 1,565
Gardner v. Delta Dental Plan of New Mexico, et al
as 23-2055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DR. WILLIAM C. GARDNER, Dr. William C. Gardner, DDS, P.A.
Defendant / Appellee:
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEW MEXICO, INC., DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MICHIGAN, INC., EDWARD J. LOPEZ, JR., as an individual and in his capacity as a CEO and others
Williams v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Theodore Williams and Theodore Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Gardner v. CIR
as 23-9000
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM C. GARDNER DDS PA TM
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
United States v. Williams
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY YARNELL WILLIAMS
United States v. Perry, II
as 23-5025
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PERRY, II
Salient Power Solutions, LLC et al v. Cullari Industries, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Salient Power Solutions, LLC and PSI Power & Controls, LLC
Defendant:
Cullari Industries, LLC f/k/a WRS Protection and Control Systems, LLC, William Richard Stewart and Jennifer Stewart
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. E-Sports Arena Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv02047
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
E-Sports Arena Inc. doing business as E-Sports Bar KC, Stacy Denise Headd and Brandon Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Communications Act of 1934
Skurkey v. Daniel, et al
as 23-6014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN V. SKURKEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DANIEL, PAUL E. QUIGLEY and ANNE THOMAS
United States v. Daniel
as 23-6011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM JOSEPH DANIEL
In re: McGill
as 23-5004
Petitioner:
In re: TRACY JOEVAUN MCGILL
Respondent:
WILLIAM "CHRIS" RANKINS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
