Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States v. Mayfield
as 24-5020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON LEE MAYFIELD
United States v. Mayfield
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEDRIC MAYFIELD
Mayfield v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Mike Mayfield
Defendant:
Cinderon LLC doing business as UPS Store #6953 and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mayfield v. Morris, et al
as 20-2061
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARL MAYFIELD
Respondent / Appellee:
GREG MORRIS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and TOM RUIZ
Zuniga, et al v. Bernalillo County, et al
as 16-704
Petitioner:
MARIA ZUNIGA, EMILY HERNANDEZ, JENNIFER GALLEGOS and others
Respondent:
BERNALILLO COUNTY, JULIAN BARELA and DAN MAYFIELD
Cummings et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv00647
Plaintiff:
Alyece Cummings and Daniel Lapka
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corp , AMGS, L.L.C. , Carmen Acquisition, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Mayfield SWD LLC et al v. Blevins et al
as 5:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Mayfield SWD LLC and Clayton Hampton
Defendant:
Mike Blevins, Jarrod Blevins, Steve Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mayfield v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 09-6113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA J. MAYFIELD, Ph.D
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel., REGIONAL UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA, a constitutional agency and UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA, a constitutional agency
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mayfield et al v. National Basketball Association et al
as 5:2006cv00571
Plaintiff:
James W Mayfield, James W Mayfield, Terry Durham and others
Defendant:
National Basketball Association, National Basketball Association, National Basketball Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
