Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Eliason v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Veronique Eliason
Defendant:
United States of America, Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Young v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
as 24-1237
Petitioner:
In re: MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Respondent:
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
In re: Young
as 24-1218
Petitioner:
MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Respondent:
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
In re: Young
as 24-1221
Petitioner:
In re: MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Respondent:
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
Eliason v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brett L. Eliason
Defendant:
United States of America, The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Kirton McConkie
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eliason v. The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Brett L. Eliason
Defendant:
The Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Kirton McConkie, Parsons Behle and Latimer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Gaddy, et al v. Corp. of the President of the Church of Jesus, et al
as 23-4110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA A. GADDY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LYLE D. SMALL and LEANNE R. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a Utah corporation sole
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 50
United States v. Day
as 23-5084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HATCHER RAMON DAY, AKA Trevor, AKA Boog, AKA Boogie
United States v. Day
as 22-7002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD DAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
