Cases 1 - 10 of 41
United States v. Jimenez-Hernandez
as 24-5060
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MACARIO JIMENEZ-HERNANDEZ, AKA Jose LNU, AKA FNU LNU, AKA Jose Ortiz-Lugo
United States v. Jimenez-Barrios
as 23-5078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE GUADALUPE JIMENEZ-BARRIOS, AKA Jose Jimenez
Jimenez-Castro v. Garland
as 22-9571
Petitioner:
MARTHA JIMENEZ-CASTRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attormey General
Gutirrez-Jimenez v. Garland
as 22-9520
Petitioner:
FABIAN GUTIRREZ-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
United States v. Jimenez
as 22-5017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GERARDO BENITEZ JIMENEZ, AKA Gerardo Martinez-Jimenez, AKA Francisco Romero-Marte, AKA Felipe Damien Ulloa, AKA Javier Romero, AKA Antonio Benetes, AKA Carlos Gonzalez-Ulloa, AKA Damien Virgen-Perez, AKA Gerardo Benitez-Jimenez
Melnick v. Raemisch, et al
as 21-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNTER ADAM MELNICK
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, KAYLA JOHNSTON, CPO, DEAN GONZALES and others
United States v. Quintero-Jimenez
as 21-3133
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS ALBERTO QUINTERO-JIMENEZ
Stampede Meat, Inc. v. Grisham et al.
as 2:2020cv01160
Defendant:
Attorney General Hector Balderas, Department of Health, State of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Stampede Meat, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Monasterio v. Greyhound Lines, et al
as 19-2170
Defendant:
BILL BLAKENSHIP, CEO in charge of security and safety, JASON VON JIMENEZ, II and DAVID LEACH, President and CEO of Greyhoundlines, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC., AKA Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. and ARNULFO BRAVO, employee of Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS MONASTERIO
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BROUILETTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
