Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Whitmore
as 23-6208
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUCAS WHITMORE, AKA Lucas Whitemore
STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions Inc et al
as 2:2023mc00781
Plaintiff:
STA Group LLC
Petitioner:
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeff Lucas, Peter Fritz, Dillon Kane Group and others
Respondent:
Wes Wells and Steve Spanglo
Morales et al v. Forte Data Systems, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00208
Respondent:
Forte Data Systems, Inc.
Petitioner:
Kurt Morales, II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Gallegos
as 23-2010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIAS LUCAS GALLEGOS
United States v. Cottingham
as 22-5004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRANCE LUCAS COTTINGHAM
Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 21-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER, CANDELAS GLOWS/ROCKY FLATS GLOWS, ROCKY FLATS RIGHT TO KNOW and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing Corp., et al
as 21-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. LUCAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DADSON MANUFACTURING CORPORATION and PETER B. LUCAS
Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 21-8031
Defendant / Appellee:
COLLEEN LANE, DAVID W. PERINO, PATRICIA E. LANE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
