Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Traditions Health, LLC v. Huffman et al
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Traditions Health, LLC
Defendant:
Donald Huffman, Sharon Reed, Kaycee Funk and others
McCullough v. Frazier et al
as 5:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Perry Adron McCullough
Defendant:
Judith K Frazier, David M OBrien and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
United States v. Maryboy
as 23-4117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PERRY MARYBOY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Perry, II
as 23-5025
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PERRY, II
Matlock v. Redbird Business Group LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Perry Matlock
Defendant:
Redbird Business Group LLC and Redbird Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 22-8022
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and UPPER GREEN RIVER ALLIANCE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, JONAH ENERGY, LLC and others
Mohon v. Spiller II et al
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Barbara Mohon
Defendant:
John C. Spiller II, Jacob A. Mears, Michael Theron Smith Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Suggs
as 22-1024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PERRY WAYNE SUGGS, JR.
In re: Bruce v. , et al
as 22-8003
Petitioner:
In re: PERRY BRUCE, SR.
Respondent:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL and MICHAEL PACHECO, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
