Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Bradshaw
as 5:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 084
George v. Beaver County, et al
as 21-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHY M. GEORGE, on behalf of the Estate of Troy Bradshaw
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAVER COUNTY, by and through the Beaver County Board of Commissioners, CAMERON M. NOEL, RANDALL ROSE and others
Bradshaw v. Perez
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Neil Bradshaw
Defendant:
Thomas Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151
Bradshaw v. Gatterman, et al
as 15-3246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY R. BRADSHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE GATTERMAN, in his individual and representative capacity, KYLER KNOBBE, in his individual and representative capacity, CHARLES HERD, in his individual and representative capacity and others
Bradshaw v. Gatterman et al
as 6:2015cv01086
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Bradshaw
Defendant:
Bruce C. Gatterman, Kyler Knobbe, Charles Herd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mayhew v. Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc, et al
as 10-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS MAYHEW
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC., et al., JENNIFER ROGERS, NORA ZIEL and others
Mayhew v. Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc, et al
as 10-1150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS MAYHEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER ROGERS, CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC., et al., NORA ZIEL and others
United States v. Bradshaw
as 08-3307
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VANCE G. BRADSHAW
Mayhew v. Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02091
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Mayhew
Defendant:
Cherry Creek Mortgage Co., Inc., Nora Ziel, Daisey Nanton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
