Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Marcus Todd Brisco et al
as 2:2023mc00111
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, YAS Castellum and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Receiver:
Kelly Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Johnson v. Lambkins, et al
as 21-1340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAMBKINS, PEEK, COMBEE and others
Seay, et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, et al
as 21-6054
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA CRAIG, R.D.H., Hygiene Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JAMES A. SPARKS, D.D.S., individually and President of District 5 of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JEFF LUNDAY, D.D.S., individually and 2nd Vice President of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH P. SEAY, D.D.S., MS and LOIS JACOBS, D.D.S., MS
Johnson v. Williams, et al
as 21-1058
Defendant / Appellee:
CASADY, CHAD, KILPOLITES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Little, et al
as 21-1042
Defendant / Appellee:
SHOEMAKER, CHAD, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Lotches, et al
as 21-1045
Defendant / Appellee:
BUNKS, SHOEMAKER, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Palmer, et al
as 21-1024
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS, RAEANNE WILL, MONTANEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Little, et al
as 20-1362
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LIGAC, CASADY, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Little, et al
as 20-1355
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LIGAC, CASADY, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
