Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jaramillo, et al v. Dill
as 20-2049
Appellant:
RICK JARAMILLO and STEVEN DURAN
Debtor:
In re: RAILYARD COMPANY, LLC
Appellee:
CRAIG DILL, Chapter 7 Trustee
Redmond, et al v. Lerner
as 20-3068
Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. REDMOND, Chapter 7 Trustee
Appellee:
MICHAEL LERNER
Debtor:
In re: MICHAEL LERNER
Redmond v. Lerner
as 20-601
Debtor:
In re: MICHAEL LERNER
Respondent:
MICHAEL LERNER
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER J. REDMOND, Chapter 7 Trustee
In re: Reynolds, et al
as 19-4150
Appellant:
PRINCE YEATES AND GELDZAHLER and J KEVIN BIRD, Chapter 7 Trustee
Debtor:
CHAROLETT KAY REYNOLDS and In re: RONALD JAY REYNOLDS
SE Property Holdings v. Stewart, et al
as 19-6104
Appellee:
TERRY P. STEWART, DAVID A. STEWART, RUSTON C. WELCH and others
Debtor:
In the Matter of: DAVID A. STEWART
Appellant:
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
SE Property Holdings v. Stewart, et al
as 19-6103
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of: DAVID A. STEWART
Appellee:
TERRY P. STEWART, DAVID A. STEWART, RUSTON C. WELCH and others
Appellant:
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
Hook v. King, et al
as 19-1188
Not Yet Classified:
In re: MARY JULIA HOOK and DAVID LEE SMITH
Appellee:
DENNIS W. KING, Chapter 7 Trustee and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Appellant:
MARY JULIA HOOK
Parr v. Rodriguez, et al
as 19-1053
Appellee:
SIMON E. RODRIGUEZ, Chapter 7 Trustee and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
Appellant:
LARRY WAYNE PARR, AKA Larry W. Parr, AKA Larry Parr
Undetermined:
In the Matter of: LARRY WAYNE PARR, AKA Larry W. Parr, AKA Larry Parr
Blackwell v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-5026
Debtor - Debtor:
In the Matter of: MALCOLM MCCRAY BLACKWELL, SR.
Appellant:
MALCOLM MCCRAY BLACKWELL, SR.
Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA N.A. and PATRICK J. MALLOY, III, Chapter 7 Trustee
Lane, et al v. Barney
as 16-8007
Debtor - Debtor:
In the Matter of: ROBERT M. LANE
Appellant:
ROBERT M. LANE
Appellee:
GARY A. BARNEY, Trustee, Chapter 7 Trustee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
