Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States v. Craine
as 19-6189
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY RAY CRAINE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GeoMetWatch, et al v. Behunin, et al
as 19-4130
Not Yet Classified:
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY ADVANCED WEATHER SYSTEMS FOUNDATION, a Utah corporation, GEOMETWATCH CORP. and UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, a Utah corporation, DBA Space Dynamics Laboratory
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN E. HALL, TEMPUS GLOBAL DATA, a Delaware corporation, CURTIS ROBERTS and others
Defendant:
MARK HURST, an individual, UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY, a state university, DEBBIE WADE, an individual and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
DAVID CRAIN
Lynn v. Brown, et al
as 19-5063
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES, sued as John Does 1-100, THEODORE RIESLING, an individual a/k/a Ted, KIMBERLY BIEDLER SCHUTZ, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY ANN LYNN
Lynn v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Purview Life Tulsa, Theodore Riesling, Phillip Feist and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ann Lynn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Craine v. National Science Foundation
as 16-9536
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MITCHELL CRAINE
Respondent:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Craine v. National Science Foundation, et al
as 15-9576
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MITCHELL CRAINE
Respondent:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Crain v. CIR
as 12-9004
Petitioner - Appellant:
LANCE CRAIN
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Crain Communications et al v. Magazine Billing Services et al
as 2:2008mc00181
Plaintiff:
Crain Communications, Crain Communications, Crain Management Services and others
Defendant:
Magazine Payment Services, Publishers Clearing Emporium, Publishers Processing Service and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
