Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Vreeland v. Raemisch, et al
as 20-1383
Defendant / Appellee:
AMICH & JENKS, COLORADO SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT BOARD ALL MEMBERS, CDOC DIRECTOR OF SOTMP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
United States v. Jenks
as 20-4023
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD JENKS, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Jenks
as 16-4119
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD JENKS, JR.
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rankin et al
as 4:2010cv00661
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Doyle Rankin, Andrea Lee Crow and LD Sports Bar & Grill of Jenks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker v. Jenks Middle Schools et al
as 4:2008cv00347
Plaintiff:
Robbi Barker
Defendant:
Jenks Middle Schools, Jenks Middle Schools, Morgan Fry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wopsock, et al v. Natchees, et al
as 06-4215
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESTER D. MILLS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Superintendent, Uintah and Ouray Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs, T. SMILEY ARROWCHIS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as vice-chairman of the Tribal Business Committee, WAYNE NORDWALL, in his individual capacity and in his oficial capacity as the Director, Western Regional Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD J. WOPSOCK, CASSANDRA KOCHAMP and LUKE J. DUNCAN
Cone, et al v. Boston Chicken, Inc., et al
as 1:1997cv01308
Plaintiff:
Leslie Gene Cone , Linda Corray , Gordon Gaebler and others
Defendant:
Boston Chicken, Inc. , Scott A. Beck , Mark W. Stephens and others
Consol_defendant:
Alex, Brown & Sons, Inc. , Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated , Merrill Lynch & Company and others
Consol_plaintiff:
George Genna , Jeff Lainer , Charles Scheffold and others
Objector:
David Lippy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
