Cases 1 - 10 of 593
Farmers Insurance Exchange et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv02261
Defendant:
Mikeal Taylor, Samuel Proal Insurance Agency Inc., Mikeal Taylor Agency Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Truck Insurance Exchange, Farmers New World Life Insurance Company, Fire Insurance Exchange and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
State of Kansas, et al v. Garland, et al
as 24-3101
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as the United States Attorney General and STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO
State of Kansas, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3097
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
MOMS FOR LIBERTY, STATE OF ALASKA, FEMALE ATHLETES UNITED and others
Amicus Curiae:
FLOYD ABRAMS, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
State of Kansas, et al v. Biden, et al
as 24-3093
Plaintiff:
STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity
Petitioner:
CATO INSTITUTE, NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE and MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
State of Alaska, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3094
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity, MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Amicus Curiae:
CATO INSTITUTE, MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY and NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE
State of Alaska, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3089
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALASKA and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., President of the United States of America, in his official capacity and MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity
Pecos Vista Apartments, LLC v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2024cv00635
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department, John Does I-X and others
Plaintiff:
Pecos Vista Apartments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Air Methods, LLC et al v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2024cv00609
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Mexico
Plaintiff:
Air Methods, LLC and Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Defendant:
Carolyn MacDonald, Lee Windsor, Paul Mazerolle and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Intervenor:
Prof Eugene Volokh
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Virginia, State of, South Carolina, State of, Idaho, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Petitioner:
Ohio, State of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
