Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, et al
as 21-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCOTT CROW, Director of ODOC and others
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae:
ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
Davis v. GEO Group, et al
as 21-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK BOWEN, Warden, RITA HOOD, Major and others
In re: Mongtomery
as 21-5061
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD MONGTOMERY
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC
Davis v. Crow, et al
as 21-7006
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTI QUICK, Chief of Security, MARK KNUTSON, Director Designee ODOC, MR. BENEFIELD, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Davis v. Core Civic, et al
as 20-7069
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITTNEY SUMMER-HOPE, MS. HAMILTON, Mental Health, SERENA BREWER, Nurse Practitioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Lay v. Oklahoma DOC, et al
as 20-6038
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE PENITENTIARY, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JERRY PERRY, H-Unit, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
