Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hogan and Associates Construction et al v. Urban Commons 6th Ave Seattle et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Hogan and Associates Construction, William A Smith and Jenny R Smith
Defendant:
Urban Commons 6th Ave Seattle and Eagle Nashville Airport Hotel
Carlisle v. Centennial Resource Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Steven J. Shapiro, Maire A. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Cupps, et al v. Pioneer Canal-Lake Hattie Irrigation District
as 21-8088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. MARK CUPPS, MARK B. KOENIG, CHERYL L. KOENIG and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PIONEER CANAL-LAKE HATTIE IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Seals v. Smith
as 20-6110
Petitioner / Appellant:
CURTIS BERNARD SEALS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. SMITH
Stillman Consulting Services v. Greene et al
as 2:2019cv00668
Defendant:
Alan Thurgood, John E. Braun, Linn Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Stillman Consulting Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Baker, et al
as 19-3016
Defendant / Appellee:
RON BAKER, Interim Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and COLETTE WINKELBAUER, Deputy Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENNY R. SMITH
O'Neill v. Smith
as 2:2017mc00480
Plaintiff:
Michael F. O'Neill
Defendant:
Matthew R. Smith
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Zamora v. Richardson et al
as 1:2012mc00003
Plaintiff:
Louis Zamora
Defendant:
Bill Richardson, Susana Martinez, State of New Mexico, The and others
Smith v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 09-6172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, C. ALLEN MCCALL and ROBERT JOHNSON
Smith v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al
as 5:2009cv00594
Plaintiff:
Gerald R Smith
Defendant:
Oklahoma Tax Commission, C Allen McCall and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
