Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Towd Point Mtge. Trust 2019-3, U.S. Bank National v. Mead, et al
as 21-3211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOWD POINT MORTGAGE TRUST 2019-3, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Indenture Trustee
Defendant / Appellant:
DENISE L. MEAD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Tenant/Occupant, MARY DOE, Tenant/Occupant, UNKNOWN SPOUSE, if any, of Denise L. Mead and others
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Rhodes et al
as 6:2012cv01191
Plaintiff:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
Gary Rhodes, Melinda Rhodes, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service v. Witt
as 1:2011mc00045
Respondent:
Boston R. Witt
Petitioner:
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service v. Fontaine et al
as 1:2011mc00040
Petitioner:
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Jama Fontaine
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service v. Garcia
as 1:2011mc00041
Petitioner:
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Robert F Garcia
Zions First National Bank v. GG&T Hotels, LLC et al
as 5:2010mc00414
Plaintiff:
Zions First National Bank
Defendant:
GG&T Hotels, LLC , Jaspinder S. Grewal , Jasdeep Grewal and others
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service v. Meskimen
as 2:2010mc00027
Petitioner:
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Chong S Meskimen
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service v. Meskimen
as 1:2010mc00027
Petitioner:
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Chong S Meskimen
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service v. King
as 1:2010mc00025
Petitioner:
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Kimberly King
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service v. Tipton
as 1:2010mc00024
Petitioner:
United States of America/Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Marcus Tipton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
