Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Oveson v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Oveson
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stevenson v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00943
Plaintiff:
Nada Stevenson
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Heiny v. Merck & Co et al
as 1:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
Joyce Heiny
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isom v. Merck & Co et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Leann Isom
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hensley v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv01370
Plaintiff:
Jo Ellen Hensley
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , N.V. Organon , Schering Corporation, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Montgomery v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2012cv00877
Plaintiff:
Rulene Montgomery
Defendant:
Merck & Co and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jodszuweit v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02307
Plaintiff:
Armida Jodszuweit
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henson v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00352
Plaintiff:
Beverly Henson
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnett v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
Melanie Barnett
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
Mariah Scott
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., N.V. Organon, Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
