Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moore v. COG Operating, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Moore
Defendant:
COG Operating, LLC, ConocoPhillips Company, John Doe Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Urie v. Phillips 66 et al
as 5:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66, ConocoPhillips Company and others
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Urie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sherman v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 5:2017cv01373
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Sherman
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company , Phillips 66 Co , John Dimond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall v. Conoco Inc., et al
as 17-6086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CONOCO INC., CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY
Alcock v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 1:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
Tammy M. Alcock
Defendant:
APRO, LLC , ConocoPhillips Company and Eagle Canyon Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black v. Tristar Constructors Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Black
Defendant:
Tristar Constructors Inc and ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 4:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Robert Graham
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purdy et al v. B.J. Services Company et al
as 6:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Charles Purdy, Shannon E Mitcham, Landen E. Mitcham and others
Defendant:
B.J. Services Company, John Doe, Conocophillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sherwin-Lucas et al v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 5:2008cv01098
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gail Sherwin-Lucas and Wade Joseph Lucas
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jenkins et al v. Amoco Oil
as 2:2007cv02508
Plaintiff:
Jeff Jenkins, Sam Hotchkiss, Sara Terry and others
Defendant:
Amoco Oil Company, Chevron Stations, Common Cents Stores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
