Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sherfield v. Gibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Noble DeAngelo Sherfield
Defendant:
Anthony Gibbs, Mike Lanoy, Katlin Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Vamar Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ashley Harris
Defendant:
Vamar Inc, Saviol Saint Jean, Rey Logistics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Miller et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2020cv00692
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Wylynn Miller and Gibb Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cook et al v. Fresenius USA Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01104
Plaintiff:
Paul Cook , Stephanie Cook , Michael Disney and others
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Inc , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc , Fresenius USA Marketing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
States, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KIM DARNALL, DEBBILYNN DAVILA, JAMIE DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00841
Plaintiff:
Michelle States , Patricia Ordino , Kim Darnall and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Naomi L Miles Revocable Trust et al v. Carter Holmes PLLC et al
as 2:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Naomi L Miles Revocable Trust , Naomi L Miles , Charles W Miles Jr Trust and others
Defendant:
Carter Holmes PLLC, Steve Holmes, Hancock & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winfield (Sr.) v. Gibbs
as 1:2010cv00410
Plaintiff:
Clinton M Winfield (Sr.)
Defendant:
Walter Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pomeroy v. Gibbs et al
as 1:2007cv00244
Plaintiff:
Tonya R. Pomeroy
Defendant:
Jeremiah J. Gibbs, Montgomery Patton and Montgomery Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
