Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Flandro et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company et al
as 2:2018cv00697
Defendant:
PacifiCorp, Chevron Pipe Line Company and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff:
Allan Flandro and Susanne Flandro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flandro et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company et al
as 2:2018cv00655
Defendant:
PacifiCorp, Chevron Pipe Line Company and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff:
Allan Flandro and Susanne Flandro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Denson v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The et al
as 2:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
McKenna Denson
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The and Joseph M. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The et al v. RJ et al
as 2:2016cv00453
Plaintiff:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The and LDS Family Services
Defendant:
RJ , MM , BN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hajicek v. Heperi et al
as 2:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
Samantha R. Hajicek
Defendant:
Vernon Heperi, Glory Drake, Lacey Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Sorenson et al
as 2:2012cv00842
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jones
Defendant:
John Robert Sorenson and Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nemelka v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. et al
as 2:2007cv00524
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Nemelka
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints., Jeffrey R. Holland, Russell M. Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
