Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Leon v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00733
Petitioner:
William Leon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00561
Petitioner:
Matthew Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tahguv v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00097
Petitioner:
Vato Tahguv
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Searle v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00252
Petitioner:
Charles Lewis Searle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Erickson v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00256
Petitioner:
Kathryn V. Erickson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Demos v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2010cv00241
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Utah, State of Washington, President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00094
Petitioner:
Gerardo Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vasquez v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01126
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Eric Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Zuniga-Castillo v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01127
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Petitioner:
Raul Alonso Zuniga-Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kinsey v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Rickey H. Kinsey
Respondent:
Randall Anderson, United States Parole Commission and United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
