Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Cano v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00658
Petitioner:
Daniel Cano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Olsen v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00656
Petitioner:
Timmy Brent Olsen
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chon v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00654
Petitioner:
Tae H. Chon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Garza-Morales v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00090
Petitioner:
Walter Osbaldo Garza-Morales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Montague v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00271
Petitioner:
Steven David Montague
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Geames v United States of America
as 2:2009cv00156
Petitioner:
Patrick Howard Geames
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v United States of America
as 2:2009cv00044
Petitioner:
Gregory R. Smith
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Engstrum v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ricky Franklin Engstrum
Defendant:
State of Utah, C. Martell and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2008cv00949
Plaintiff:
Royal G. Jones, Sr
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moreno v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv00861
Petitioner:
Raoul Moreno
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
