Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Perez v. El Tequila, et al
as 16-5002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
EL TEQUILA, LLC and CARLOS AGUIRRE, individually
Bracamontes et al v. Bimbo Bakeries USA INC
as 1:2015cv02324
Plaintiff:
Hector Bracamontes , Felipe Corrales-Guerrero , Adrian Davila and others
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Foreclosure Connection et al
as 2:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Foreclosure Connection and Jason Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez v. Jeffs et al
as 2:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Lyle Jeffs, Dale Barlow and Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Perez et al v. Schrepfer et al
as 1:2015cv01701
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
M. Peter Schrepfer, Schrepfer Industries, Inc. 401(k) Plan, Schrepfer Industries, Inc. Health Benefits Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Stewart Environmental Consultants, LLC
as 1:2015cv01509
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Stewart Environmental Consultants, LLC, David Stewart and Stewart Environmental Consultants LLC 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez et al v. Fog River et al
as 2:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Fog River and John Bowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez v. Kasim
as 4:2015cv00392
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Isam Kasim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Branch 504, National Association of Letter Carriers
as 1:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Branch 504, National Association of Letter Carriers and David F. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Perez v. Mavis
as 1:2014cv03483
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Perez
Defendant:
Alvin Martin Mavis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
