Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rhodes et al v. PGX Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rhodes, Cassandra Mason and John Bray
Defendant:
PGX Holdings, Inc., Progrexion Teleservices, Inc., Progrexion Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Hansen v. PGX Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Hansen
Defendant:
PGX Holdings, Inc., Progrexion Teleservices, Inc., Progrexion Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Reyes et al v. First Judicial District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2020cv00330
Plaintiff:
Connie Warren, Elisha Evridge and Anai Reyes
Defendant:
First Judicial District Attorney's Office, Marco P. Serna and State of New Mexico Administrative Office of the District Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Neal v. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Office fo the Attorney General
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Shelli Neal
Defendant:
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Office fo the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Ward v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The et al
as 2:2014cv02361
Plaintiff:
Daryl Ward
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The and Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees Classified by the Contract Holder as Non-Partner Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Williams v. Bower et al
as 5:2013cv00348
Defendant:
Walter M Bower and Oklahoma Attorneys Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Tracie Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Ward v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The et al
as 2:2012cv02106
Plaintiff:
Daryl Ward
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The , Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees Classified by the Contract Holder as Non-Partner Attorneys and Group Life Insurance During Total Disability
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
