Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Medina v. ADC Solutions Auto, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02957
Plaintiff:
Epifano Medina
Defendant:
ADC Solutions Auto, LLC, Horizon Brands Inc., Winplus North America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelums v. Mandu Wellness LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nelums
Defendant:
Mandu Wellness LLC, Aaron Mandujan, Brian Patrick Stickney and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Combat Brands, LLC v. RDX Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Combat Brands, LLC
Defendant:
RDX Inc. and RDX Sports LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Black Mountain Capital, LLC v. Wedge Brands LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Black Mountain Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Wedge Brands LLC, ZG Holdings LLC, KAR Direct LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Mendoza v. Midwood Brands LLC
as 1:2021cv02054
Plaintiff:
Mary Mendoza
Defendant:
Midwood Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Star Brands, LLC v. Pasolindo LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01738
Defendant:
Pasolindo LLC, Andrea Brakefield and Scott Brakefield
Plaintiff:
Star Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phy v. Instant Brands Inc. et al.
as 6:2020cv01325
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com.ksdc LLC, INSTANT BRANDS HOLDING INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KAYCE PHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
