Cases 71 - 80 of 137
Ring v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Betty Ring
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mason v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00764
Plaintiff:
Andrea Mason
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
Sheila Perry
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Register v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Lillian Register
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02442
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Smith and Martin Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00762
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jackson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bond v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00761
Plaintiff:
Monika Bond
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific
as 2:2012cv00655
Plaintiff:
Misty Johnson and Brandon K. Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hyer et al v. Boston Scientific
as 1:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Susan G. Hyer and Zane Hyer
Defendant:
Boston Scientific
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
