Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 12-1133
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, a Colorado non-profit corporation and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant: TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL, in her official capacity as the Chief Forrester of the US Forest Service, TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as the Chief Forester of the U.S. Forest Service and others
The Ark Initiative, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1473
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE ARK INITIATIVE, ALEX FORSYTHE and PAUL SMITH
Plaintiff: DONALD DUERR
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL
McKeen v. United States Forest Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2290
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUGH MCKEEN
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, MICHAEL JOHANNS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, ABIGAIL R. KIMBALL, in her official capacity as Chief of the Forest Service and others
Heyland v. Frank
as 6:2008cv01178
Plaintiff: Alice Heyland and Alice Heyland
Defendant: Abigail R. Frank
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
McKeen v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2007cv00503
Plaintiff: Hugh B McKeen
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Michael Johanns, Abigail R. Kimball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
McKeen v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2007cv00503
Plaintiff: Hugh B McKeen
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Michael Johanns, Abigail R. Kimball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?