Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Breeze Aviation Group v. National Mediation Board, et al
as 23-4079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BREEZE AVIATION GROUP, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL, AKA ALPA
Breeze Aviation Group v. National Mediation Board
as 2:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Breeze Aviation Group
Defendant:
National Mediation Board
Intervenor:
Air Line Pilots Association
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0151 Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vanderwoude v. Global Processing Services
as 1:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jacob Vanderwoude
Defendant:
Global Processing Services doing business as Mediation Processing Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mediate v. Nunez Group, LLC, The et al
as 1:2019cv00579
Defendant:
Lorenzo Nunez, Jr, Nunez Group, LLC, The and Nunez Group, LLC, The doing business as El Chingon Mexican Bistro
Plaintiff:
Paul Mediate
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00647
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
