Cases 1 - 10 of 15
USSEC v. Reven Holdings, Inc., et al
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
REVEN HOLDINGS, INC., DBA Reven Pharmaceuticals, REVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BRIAN D. DENOMME and others
Intervenor:
LEAH SCHAAT and LEE ANN FROST
Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing, et al
as 23-3124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. LUCAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DADSON MANUFACTURING CORPORATION and PETER B. LUCAS
Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv02107
Plaintiff:
James R. Lucas
Defendant:
Dadson Manufacturing Corporation and Peter B. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing Corp., et al
as 21-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. LUCAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DADSON MANUFACTURING CORPORATION and PETER B. LUCAS
Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv02509
Plaintiff:
James R. Lucas
Defendant:
Pamela K. Lucas, Dadson Manufacturing Corporation and Peter B. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Cole
as 1:2020cv01125
Plaintiff:
Leah L. Cole
Defendant:
Peter B. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Komis v. Drury Hotels Company, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00998
Defendant:
Drury Colorado Spring, LLC and Drury Hotels Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Peter B Komis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Komis v. Drury Hotels Company, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00860
Defendant:
Drury Colorado Spring, LLC and Drury Hotels Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Peter B Komis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davidson v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Peter B Davidson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
B. v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 2:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
Peter B.
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross, Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation Welfare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
