Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jordan v. United States Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv03317
Petitioner:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
United States Dept. of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, E. Conorer and Ausp Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Blevins, Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv02208
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Blevins, Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv02183
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Blevins, Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Thomson International, Incorporated
as 1:2020cv02386
Plaintiff:
Carissa E. Hughes
Defendant:
Thomson International, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomson v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2018cv01245
Plaintiff:
Allison Thomson
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kouzmanoff v. Thomson Reuters Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
Marc Kouzmanoff
Defendant:
Thomson Reuters Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rewerts et al v. Exampla, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01992
Plaintiff:
Michael Rewerts , Taylor Rewerts , Landon Rewerts and others
Defendant:
Exempla, Inc., Glen Lacher, John F. Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
