Cases 1 - 10 of 73
In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, et al
as 24-10503
Petitioner:
In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC and SAMARK LOPEZ BELLO
Respondent:
CARLOS EDUARDO MARRON, JANE DOE, C.R., A Minor and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
MG Freesites LTD, et al v. Jane Doe
as 24-90001
Petitioner:
MG FREESITES LTD, MG FREESITES II LTD, MINDGEEK S.A.R.L. and others
Respondent:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE #2
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
In re: Bondary McCall
as 23-14099
Petitioner:
In re: BONDARY MCCALL
Respondent:
CLERK - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, JOHN OR JANE DOE, REBECCA and others
Leon BrightIn re: Leon Bright
as 23-13749
Petitioner:
In re: LEON BRIGHT
Respondent:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
Moliere Dimanche, Jr.In re: Moliere Dimanche, Jr.
as 23-13013
Petitioner:
In re: MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Respondent:
TAKELA JACKSON, R. TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Secretary, Florida Agency for Health Care AdministIn re: Secretary, Florida Agency for Health Care Administ
as 23-11126
Petitioner:
In re: SECRETARY, FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent:
AUGUST DEKKER, BRIT ROTHSTEIN, SUSAN DOE and others
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Jane Doe v. Jomy SterlingIn re: Jane Doe v. Jomy Sterling
as 22-10400
Petitioner:
In re: JANE DOE, a.k.a. Beeism
Respondent:
JOMY STERLING
Gernard D. ChestnutIn re: Gernard D. Chestnut
as 21-14488
Petitioner:
In re: GERNARD CHESTNUT
Respondent:
SANTA ROSA CI WARDEN, J. NEEL, Lieutenant, HUGHES, Lieutenant and others
Melvin Robertson v. Raphael Warnock, et al
as 21-14481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPHAEL G. WARNOCK, SONNY PERDUE, Individual and Official Capacity, THURBERT BAKER, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
