Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Joseph Gilberti, Jr. v. President of the United States, et al
as 23-10053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH DENNIS GILBERTI, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL CLINTON and others
Neal Farmer v. Sonny Steen, et al
as 22-11747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEAL CLIFTON FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
SONNY J. STEEN, AJC PROPERTIES, LLC and SECRETARY, STATE OF ALABAMA
Shannon Rutherford v. USA
as 18-10625
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHANNON RUTHERFORD
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gadsden Industrial Park LLC v. USA, et al
as 17-15325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GADSDEN INDUSTRIAL PARK LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CMC INC. and HARSCO CORPORATION
Pennant Management Inc v. USA
as 17-15103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PENNANT MANAGEMENT INC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harry Wilson v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 17-15120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY LEE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and JEAN C. LOVEJOY, Post Master General
Jestin Sacks v. Douglas Dorsey, et al
as 17-12211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESTIN MAX SACKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS ANDREW DORSEY, State of Florida, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Collier County v. RTG, LLC
as 17-12108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
Defendant - Appellee:
RTG, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company
Defendant:
HOLIDAY CVS, L.L.C., a corporate subsidiary of CVS Health Corp.
Christopher Lawrence, et al v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 17-11564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE and OLIVIA M. PONTOO
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
:
SERVICE
Maria Fountain v. USA
as 17-11430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA FOUNTAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
