Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Waseem Daker v. Neil Warren
as 17-14481
Petitioner - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL WARREN, Sheriff, Cobb County
Daniel Cobble v. Victor Reynolds, et al
as 17-11587
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee:
VICTOR REYNOLDS, Cobb County District Attorney and U.S. GOVERNMENT
Daniel Cobble v. Joan Bloom, et al
as 17-11389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN VAUGHN BLOOM, Cobb County Magistrate Judge, KENNITH O. NIX, Cobb County Superior Court Judge and RICHARD NOLAN BLEVINS, JR., Cobb County Assistant District Attorney
Daniel Cobble v. Dorothy Robinson, et al
as 17-10380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY ROBINSON, Cobb County Superior Court Judge and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Daniel Cobble v. Victor Reynolds, et al
as 17-10094
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee:
VICTOR REYNOLDS, Cobb County District Attorney and U.S. GOVERNMENT
Waseem Daker v. Neil Warren
as 16-17459
Petitioner - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL WARREN, Sheriff, Cobb County
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. Government, et al
as 16-17019
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PETE SMITH, Sumter County Jail and others
Waseem Daker v. Sheriff, Cobb County
as 16-16916
Petitioner - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERIFF, COBB COUNTY
Chon Berrong v. Jason Fincher, et al
as 16-12136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHON BERRONG, a.k.a. Shon Berrong
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON B. FINCHER, STATE COURT OF COBB COUNTY, JOAN VAUGHN BLOOM and others
Torrey Coleman v. Cobb County District Attorney, et al
as 16-10957
Petitioner - Appellant:
TORREY COLEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
COBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and COBB COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
