Cases 101 - 110 of 5,994
Keith Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10655
Petitioner:
KEITH BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gregory Tolliver v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al
as 24-10643
Petitioner:
GREGORY A. TOLLIVER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Tavoris Simmons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10648
Petitioner:
TAVORIS K. SIMMONS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL SERVICE
Jonas Griffin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10632
Petitioner:
JONAS TRAMELL GRIFFIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ambrose Vogds v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10627
Petitioner:
AMBROSE VOGDS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Deneal Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10606
Petitioner:
DENEAL O. BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Anthony Fails v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10587
Petitioner:
ANTHONY J. FAILS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Christopher Woods v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10617
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morgan Armstrong v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10603
Petitioner:
MORGAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
David Posta v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10613
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHN POSTA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
