Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 37
USA v. Armando Cardon-Cortez
as 18-10688
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ARMANDO CARDON-CORTEZ, a.k.a. Vatto, a.k.a. Vatto
USA v. Bryan Cortez Gongora We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-12285
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BRYAN NILSEN CORTEZ GONGORA
Froilan Cortez v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-16535
Petitioner - Appellant: FROILAN CORTEZ
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Antonio Harris, Jr. v. USA
as 16-16221
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTONIO CORTEZ HARRIS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Antonio Toles
as 16-15713
Petitioner: In re: ANTONIO CORTEZ TOLES
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marquis Wilson v. USA
as 16-15331
Petitioner - Appellant: MARQUIS CORTEZ WILSON
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Al-Ghena International Corp., et al v. Talat Radwan, et al
as 16-14856
Plaintiff - Appellee: AL-GHENA INTERNATIONAL CORP. and SHAIRCO FOR TRADING INDUSTRY AND CONTRACTING
Defendant - Appellant: TALAT RADWAN, JASON RADWAN and CORTEZ HOLDING GROUP, INC.
Al-Ghena International Corp., et al v. Talat Radwan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-14168
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee: AL-GHENA INTERNATIONAL CORP. and SHAIRCO FOR TRADING INDUSTRY AND CONTRACTING
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant: CORTEZ HOLDING GROUP, INC., JASON RADWAN and TALAT RADWAN
: SERVICE
USA v. Cortez Hodges
as 14-11994
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CORTEZ TERRAIL HODGES
Armando Cardon-Cortez v. USA
as 15-12087
Petitioner - Appellant: ARMANDO CARDON-CORTEZ
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?