Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Bradley Steiger v. Luther Strange, III, et al
as 17-14535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER
Defendant - Appellee:
LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, State Attorney General, in his Individual and official capacity, MARY BECKER WINDOM, Chief Appellate Judge, in her individual and official capacity, MARK BRUTON, ADOC Records Director, in his individual and official capacity and others
Marla Dixon, et al v. USA
as 17-13792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLA DIXON, individually and EARL REESE-THORNTON, SR., individually, and as parents and natural guardians of E. R.T, JR., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marla Dixon, et al v. USA
as 17-13780
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
MARLA DIXON, individually and EARL REESE-THORNTON, SR., individually, and as parents and natural guardians of E. R.T, JR., a minor
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Eric Reese
as 17-12711
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC JEROME REESE
Wallace Dean-Mitchell v. Constance Reese
as 17-10773
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALLACE DEAN-MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE
Maurice Beavers v. USA
as 16-17070
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAURICE JAMMOROW BEAVERS, a.k.a. Chris Stokes, a.k.a. Frank Monroe West, a.k.a. Shadrian Beavers, a.k.a. Reese
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Maurice Williams
as 16-16405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Reese
USA v. Chadwick Reese
as 16-15064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHADWICK L. REESE
USA v. Chadwick Reese
as 16-15064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHADWICK L. REESE
In re: Thomas Reese
as 16-12444
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS LEE REESE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
