Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Spindy Charlatan v. Clayton County Government, et al
as 21-12043
Defendant / Appellee:
IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (I.C.E.) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SPINDY CHARLATAN
Jose Maya v. Department of Homeland Sec., et al
as 19-12363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MAYA
Defendant / Appellee:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (I.C.E.), SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Yvon Themeus, Sr. v. Immigration and Customs Enforc
as 15-13240
Petitioner - Appellant:
YVON THEMEUS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (I.C.E.)
Hopeton Dickson v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 15-11069
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOPETON DICKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (I.C.E.) and others
Arthur Francis v. Krome Service Processing Cente, et al
as 14-14600
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR FRITZ-JOHN FRANCIS
Respondent - Appellee:
KROME SERVICE PROCESSING CENTER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-14030
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arthur Francis v. Krome Service Processing Cente, et al
as 14-12531
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR FRITZ-JOHN FRANCIS
Respondent - Appellee:
KROME SERVICE PROCESSING CENTER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Sirgio Caro v. I.C.E.
as 13-10740
Petitioner - Appellant:
SIRGIO CARO
Respondent - Appellee:
I.C.E., c/o United States of America
Yuniet Canizares v. I.C.E.
as 13-10417
Petitioner - Appellant:
YUNIET CANIZARES
Respondent - Appellee:
I.C.E., c/o United States of America
Jorge Alpizar v. I.C.E.
as 12-16510
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE ALPIZAR
Respondent - Appellee:
I.C.E., c/o United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
