Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Richard Bard, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13540
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID KLINE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD W. BARD, RODERICK BATES, JR., ELENA BAZILIAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Philip Krause v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP KRAUSE, VALENCIA GARRETT, ANA MONDRAGON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT and COMMON CAUSE
Not Classified By Court:
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE
Jason Bailey v. Sharon Lewis, et al
as 23-12072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON QUINARD BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON LEWIS, KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, JOSHUA JONES and others
James Smith v. Sheriff
as 22-12313
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES A. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERIFF
USA v. James Smith, III
as 22-10028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER SMITH, III
USA v. James Smith
as 20-10995
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Smith, Jr.
as 19-14806
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EARL SMITH, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abdul Bey v. Georgia Department of Corr., et al
as 19-13292
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, COMMISSIONER, JAMES D. SMITH, Georgia Department of Corrections, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Kristie Drinosky v. Southeast Title, et al
as 18-13026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTIE DRINOSKY, o/b/o herself and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHEAST TITLE OF THE SUNCOAST, INC., a Florida profit company and JAMES G. SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
