Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Johnnie Overstreet, et al v. Worth County Georgia, et al
as 21-14391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE OVERSTREET, Administrator of the Estate of Bryan Overstreet, deceased and CHELSEA WELCH, As parent and next friend of A. Overstreet, a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
WORTH COUNTY GEORGIA, JEFF HOBBY, Former Sheriff of Worth County, Georgia, in his official and individual capacities, CORONOR JOHN M. JOHNSON, Coroner of Worth County, Georgia, in his official and individual capacities and others
John Johnson v. USA
as 21-10934
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN MURRAY JOHNSON
John JohnsonIn re: John Johnson
as 21-10687
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN MURRAY JOHNSON
Roger Baker, Jr. v. John Johnson, Jr., et al
as 20-10167
Defendant / Appellee:
BOBBY G. PETERS, Judge Superior Court-Talbot County and JOHN WILLIAM JOHNSON, JR., Judge of Magistrate Court-Talbot County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR.
In re: John Johnson
as 18-13247
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN WILLIAM JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Johnson v. USA
as 17-14026
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: John Johnson
as 16-13747
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN MURRAY JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: John Johnson
as 16-11912
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN MURRAY JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Johnson, et al v. Unique Vacations, Inc., et al
as 11-16126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT JOHNSON and DIANA CANTU, as his wife
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIQUE VACATIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, SANDALS RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, LTD, a foreign corporation, d.b.a. Sandals Grande St. Lucian Spa and Beach Resort and SANDALS GRANDE ST. LUCIAN SPA AND BEACH RESORT, a foreign corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
