Cases 141 - 150 of 200,016
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marous v. Now Optics Holdings, LLC
as 1:2024cv22122
Plaintiff:
Richard Marous
Defendant:
Now Optics Holdings, LLC doing business as Stanton Optical
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Weingrad v. DH & RK Investments LLC
as 9:2024cv80701
Plaintiff:
Leon Weingrad
Defendant:
DH & RK Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas v. BRIGADE MANUFACTURING, INC.
as 1:2024cv22117
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Rojas
Defendant:
BRIGADE MANUFACTURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MARTELLO v. PILO'S STREET TACOS 3 LLC
as 1:2024cv22127
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MARTELLO
Defendant:
PILO'S STREET TACOS 3 LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shelton v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv22118
Plaintiff:
Garth Shelton
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
