Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Perez v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv21501
Plaintiff:
Sandra Perez
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd., Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. d/b/a NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sparks-Vessel v. United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC
as 0:2024cv60914
Plaintiff:
Ebony T. Sparks-Vessel
Defendant:
United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1970 CHEVROLET CHEVELLE, 2004 39' MARINE TECHNOLOGY INC VESSEL WITH MOTORS, AND 2012 39' RAM INVESTMENTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA SEAVEE VESSEL WITH MOTORS & TRAILER
as 1:2024mc22030
Not Yet Classified:
1970 CHEVROLET CHEVELLE, 2004 39' MARINE TECHNOLOGY INC VESSEL WITH MOTORS, AND 2012 39' RAM INVESTMENTS OF SOUTH FLORIDA SEAVEE VESSEL WITH MOTORS & TRAILER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983 Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
in the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liabuility by FUTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY and NICOLAS AULAR as beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundance motor vessel v. All potential claimants and/or the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Su
as 1:2024cv21870
Petitioner:
in the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liabuility by FUTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY and NICOLAS AULAR as beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundance motor vessel
Claimant:
All potential claimants and/or the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundance motor vessel against Petitioner
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185 Petition by vessel owner for limitation of liability
In the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration from or limitation of Liability by FUTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC and NICOLAS AULAR as beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundancer motor vessel v. All potential claimants against Petitioner and/or
as 1:2024cv21872
Petitioner:
In the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration from or limitation of Liability by FUTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC and NICOLAS AULAR as beneficial owner of the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundancer motor vessel
Claimant:
All potential claimants against Petitioner and/or the 1999 Sea Ray 630 Sundancer motor vessel
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185 Petition by vessel owner for limitation of liability
Mirage Yacht, Inc. v. A 2013 63 Marquis Yachts recreational vessel
as 1:2024cv21095
Plaintiff:
Mirage Yacht, Inc.
Defendant:
A 2013 Marquis Yachts recreational vessel
Intervenor:
Jens Friedrick Karl Goetz
Claimant:
KTM Venture Group, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
JOHNSTONS MARINE SERVICES, LLC and NORSEMAN SHIPBUILDING AND BOATYARD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Fast Response Marine Towing & Salvage, LLC v. M/V Set On Fire et al
as 1:2024cv21605
Plaintiff:
Fast Response Marine Towing & Salvage, LLC
Defendant:
M/V Set On Fire, a 42' Azimut motor vessel, in rem and Nicolas Lorenzon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
VY MARINA MILE LLC v. Boscaino et al
as 0:2024cv60335
Plaintiff:
VY MARINA MILE LLC dba MARINA ROAD BOAT YARD and VY MARINA MILE LLC a Domestic Limited Liability Company doing business as Marina Road Boat Yard
Defendant:
MASSIMILIANO aka MAX BOSCAINO, Unnamed 45' Cranchi Manufactured Vessel HID No. CRA7352FK213, Massimiliano Boscaino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Chenault v. Seabulk Vessel Management et al
as 0:2024cv60277
Plaintiff:
Kevin Chenault
Defendant:
Seabulk Vessel Management, Seabulk Logistics Services, LLC, Seabulk Marine Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD
as 1:2024cv20723
Plaintiff:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD., as owner of the 2022 Sea-Doo GTX PRO 130 vessels, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability and IN RE THE MATTER OF: Petition by Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD
Respondent:
Laureen Pellegrino
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185 Petition by vessel owner for limitation of liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
