Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Fagerstrom et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 1:2013cv00913
Plaintiff:
D. Kipp Fagerstrom and Heather Ann Fagerstrom
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA and HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Pinnock v. Selena Finance et al
as 1:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Delroy Pinnock
Defendant:
Selena Finance, Albertelli Law, Aurora Bank, FSB and others
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Dabney
as 1:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Gregory D. Dabney, II
Thirdparty_defendant:
Nathan Deal and Sam Olens
Counter_claimant:
Gregory D. Dabney, II
Counter_defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA , Nathan Deal and Sam Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Glover et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2012cv02705
Plaintiff:
Leon Glover and Delores Glover
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, Shapiro & Swertfeger, Infinity Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Dhanpath
as 1:2012cv02218
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Harriram Dhanpath
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Mclver
as 1:2012cv01796
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Catherine Mclver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Urbano v. Barrett, Daffin & Frappier, L.L.P. et al
as 1:2012cv01350
Plaintiff:
Robinson Urbano
Defendant:
Barrett, Daffin & Frappier, L.L.P., Stevens & Stevens LLC and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Dhanpath
as 1:2012cv01139
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Defendant:
Harriram Dhanpath
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fagerstrom et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 1:2012cv01123
Plaintiff:
D. Kipp Fagerstrom and Heather Ann Fagerstrom
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Barbera
as 1:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Angel J. Barbera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
